I
read Spheres
of Justice
by Michael Walzer. By “spheres” he means different domains of
social life – politics, economics, education, family and friends –
that call for different principles of distributive justice. I found
his observations of similarities and differences between the
different spheres, and how principles reflected by practice have
changed over centuries, both interesting and thought provoking.
Throughout
history, the market has been one of the most important mechanisms for
the distribution of social goods – ones that are made, exchanged,
divided, or shared – but it has never been a complete system.
Similarly, no state power has been so pervasive as to regulate all
patterns of making, sharing, exchanging, or dividing to fully control
all distribution (p. 4).
Philosophers
have mostly sought a single principle, criterion or underlying unity
for distributive justice. Such philosophical impulse is unavoidable,
but he argues that such a search is to misunderstand the subject (p.
4).
He
argues against the simple equality of egalitarianism and favors a
“complex equality” with different distributive principles in
different spheres.
All
the book reviews on Amazon are very short. There are longer ones, but
most are in journals and hence not easily, freely accessible.
Next
Next
No comments:
Post a Comment