A
intellectual war involving math and politics also occurred between
Thomas Hobbes and John Willis. Near the end of the English
Civil War (1642-1651) Hobbes wrote Leviathan.
In it Hobbes argued for a social contract and rule by an absolute
sovereign. He wrote that civil war and a brutal state of nature ("the
war of all against all") could only be avoided by strong,
undivided government.
Hobbes
also was a geometer of some repute. Similar to the Jesuits, he
believed that the answer to uncertaity and chaos was absolute
certainty and eternal order. They believed the key to both was
Euclidean geometry. He set about trying to "square the circle"
and solve two other long-standing geometry problems. "Square the
circle", or "quadrature the circle," means construct a
square with area exactly equal to the area of a given circle. (It can
be done with great, but not perfect, precision.) Under the
traditional restrictions of using only a compass and straight edge,
this had been proven impossible. Hobbes tried anyway. Mathematician
John Willis was well prepared to discredit any solution Hobbes
proposed. Willis' political attitudes also reflected the chaotic
years in England, but he believed in a state that would allow for a
plurality of views and wide scope for dissent. Willis also sided with
those who supported the use of infinitesimals.
Hobbes
was also a sharp critic of the mathematical works of Willis. For
Hobbes the infinitely small was an unwelcome intruder in mathematics.
In contrast Willis considered practically all the features of the
infinitely small to be clear advantages. His math was for
investigating the world as it is. The world could be a little
mysterious, unexplored, and ambiguous, but it invited new
investigation and new discovery (p. 287).
No comments:
Post a Comment