I
read the book Infinitesimal: How A Dangerous Mathematical Theory Shaped The Modern World.
In mathematics, infinitesimals are things so small that there is no
way to measure them. I thought the history in Infinitesimal
– both political-religious and mathematics from about 1500 to 1675
– was very interesting. I believe the author makes the tie between
them stronger than what they actually were, but there were parallel
ideas - parties opposing one another in two very different realms.
The
Society of Jesus, more commonly called the Jesuits, has a prominent
role. Before Martin Luther initiated the Protestant Reformation, the
Catholic Church was the dominant power in society. Kings and their
lower ranking brethren depended on approval by the Catholic clergy.
The anti-Reformists believed that the Reformation would bring
about disorder and war. The Jesuits became the leading defenders of
Catholicism. In large part their success was due to their building of
educational institutions.
A
leading Jesuit, Christopher
Clavius, was almost
single-handedly responsible for the adoption of a rigorous
mathematics curriculum – Euclidean based -- in an age where
mathematics was often ridiculed by philosophers and religious
authorities. While Clavius clearly opposed the heliocentric model of
Copernicus, it was mainly other Jesuits who opposed infinitesimals.
A
leading proponent of infinitesimals
was mathematician Bonaventura
Cavalieri. He was a Jesuat, which is different from a Jesuit.
Except
as noted below, the author summarizes the book's thesis very well as
follows.
"Why
did the best minds of the early modern world fight so fiercely over
the infinitely small? The reason was that much more was at stake than
an obscure mathematical concept. The fight was over the face of the
modern world. Two camps confronted each other over the infinitesmal.
On the one side were ranged the forces of heirarchy and order –
Jesuits, Hobbesians, French royal courtiers, and High Chuch
Anglicans. They believed in a unified and fixed order in the world,
both natural and human, and were fiercely opposed to infinitesmals.
On the other side were comparative "liberalizers" such as
Galileo, [John] Wallis, and the Newtonians. They believed in a more
pluralistic and flexible order, one that might accommodate a range of
views and diverse centers of power, and championed infinitesmals and
their use in mathematics. The lines were drawn, and a victory for one
side or the other would leave its imprint on the world for centuries
to come" (p. 8).
Most
of the history presented in the book happened before Isaac Newton
published his revolutionary Principia in 1687,
so Cavalieri instead of "the Newtonians" arguably fits
better.
No comments:
Post a Comment