So ITEP describes the numbers as reductions
in taxes,
not the reduction in taxable
income. The former
is the latter times a
tax rate. I looked for
the $1.1 billion in
J.P.Morgan
Chase’s 2018 10-K.
It’s on page 210. "Income tax benefits related to share-based
incentive arrangements recognized in the Firm’s Consolidated
statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016, were $1.1 billion, $1.0 billion and $916 million,
respectively. The following table sets forth [ ] the actual income tax benefit related to
tax deductions from the exercise of the stock options." The table shows $75 million for 2018.
So it’s clear
that
$1.1 billion was
the reduction in taxable
income and $75
million was the
reduction in tax.
Why
did ITEP claim a
reduction in taxable income as a reduction in tax? $75 million would have put J.P.Morgan #25 or off the list. By the way, $75
million is
only 6.8% of $1.1
billion, whereas the
main corporate tax rate is 21%. I can’t reconcile the difference.
Perhaps the $1.1 billion includes some incentive compensation other
than nonqualified stock options. The
10-K refers to such plans (RSU and PSU).
Also
relevant to my recent posts about employee stock options is
the following on page
209 of
the 10-K: “The Firm’s
policy for issuing shares upon settlement of employee share-based
incentive awards is to issue either new shares of common stock or
treasury shares. During 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Firm settled all of
its employee share-based awards by issuing treasury shares.” In
other words, J.P.Morgan
Chase used what I
labeled Method 2 here,
a method none of ITEP’s articles mention.
The
tax break amount
ITEP shows
for Amazon (#1) matches
its 10-K and
is a reduction in tax. Ditto
for Facebook (#5). I didn't find ITEP's number for Google (#4) in its 10-K. So
there doesn't appear to be a systematic error.
No comments:
Post a Comment