Murphy's Choice: Cooperation, Enterprise, and Human Action says a distinguishing feature of Ludwig von Mises's economics
is the pure
time preference theory of interest,
in which positive interest rates are explained by reference to the
fact that people prefer goods available in the present versus the
same goods available only at a future date. Most professional
economists outside the Austrian School would say that interest is a
return to the marginal product of capital, like wages are a return to
the marginal product of labor (the productivity theory).
Eugene
Böhm-Bawerk
in Capital and Interest (1884) classified and critiqued existing
explanations of interest. He called the productivity theory of
interest a category mistake. His own
theory was more or less the time preference theory of interest, although he didn't label it that.
Later
Frank Fetter (1904) offered a pure
time preference theory of interest. Mises
adopted Fetter's time preference theory with a twist. Whereas Fetter
regarded the theory as empirical, Mises elevated it to a category of
action.
Oddly
enough, Murphy says, "After explaining the Austrian approach to
interest – which has nothing to do with the productivity of capital
per se – we will see how the accumulation of capital goods
increases the productivity of labor and land resources, thereby
increasing income" (Choice
224).
Murphy
proceed to explain what Böhm-Bawerk
dubbed the naive productivity theory and and their critique of it. It
starts on page 225 of Choice.
The entire section is not available using the Look
Inside
feature on Amazon, but the argument more or less follows Murphy's
paper Why
Do Capitalists Earn Interest Income?,
available online here.
In
future posts I will briefly present the Austrian arguments for the pure time preference theory and against the productivity theory, and present my
reasons for not being persuaded that time preference gives a
full explanation without regard to the productivity of capital.
No comments:
Post a Comment