The Nature of the Firm
says nothing about the make or buy decision in regard to computer software.
However, I suspect it arises quite often in today’s world, and it did during my
own work career. Both ways have their advantages and disadvantages.
The following observations are based on my work experience. Developing
one’s own software gives maximum control, but it may be slower and cost more.
Buying software from a vendor may be quicker and cheaper, but it provides less
control. When the buyer later wants changes to the software – which is nearly
always true in a workplace – the buyer is subject to the vendor’s and its other
customers’ priorities, not merely its own.
On second thought, there is a third option, which I will
call hire. That is, hire a consulting firm or independent
contractor that specializes in the kind of software needed. This way seems to blend characteristics of
make and buy. The hirer has a strong degree of control as long as the hired is
under contract. Once the contract period is over, the situation for the hirer
is much like having bought the software. That is, until the hirer wants changes,
a very likely occurrence. Then it’s probably
hire again.
No comments:
Post a Comment